SAMPLE TAPE

Rewards study

A creator divides a token’s rewards between two kinds, from all to one to all to the other. Holder rewards go to everyone who holds, by balance. Trader rewards go to the people trading, by volume, and no trade earns more than 50% of the fee it paid. This study shows what each pays out, to how many people, and what it costs to deliver. Rewards are paid by the token's smart contracts, out of that token's own trading fees. The contracts distribute them to holders or traders by fixed rules. Nobody chooses who gets paid. Backer and its operator, Community Platform, never hold, pay or control them, and they are not a payment by the company. Of every trading fee, only the 0.25% platform fee goes to the platform's treasury.
Rewards rate0.75%
Holders1,250
Active traders / 30d180
30-day volume$184.0K
Network
Three-way comparison · 30D
Trader rewards
Claim-based
Pool$1.4K
Per trader$7.67
Recipients180
Admin surfacenone, claim-based
Claims are economic at this setting.
Holder rewards
Pushed to every holder
Pool$1.4K
Per holder$1.10
Recipients1,250
Push cost$1
Needs an admin-maintained exclusion list for pools, bridges and exchange wallets, which is a standing duty.
Off
Budget to LP injection
Pool$0
Per recipient–
Recipients0
Admin surfacenone
Moving this budget into LP injection tightens spreads for every trader.
The finding
At small volume neither mechanism pays meaningfully. As volume grows, a holder distribution pays more per recipient but costs more to deliver, because every holder is paid whether or not they trade. A volume discount goes only to the traders who generated the fees, and they claim it when it is worth claiming.